Critique of The Day After Tomorrow Essay
995 Words4 Pages
Critique of The Day After Tomorrow
The movie, The Day After Tomorrow, addresses the issue of global warming. The movie?s portrayal of the events caused by global warming was extreme and not very believable. Some of the information is backed up by science but most is completely off the wall and nonrealistic. The movie cited the cause of the global climate change to be the rise in temperature due to greenhouse gasses. The warmer temperatures caused the polar ice caps to melt, and the increased amount of freshwater in the ocean disrupted the North Atlantic Current. The North Atlantic Current is what is responsible for the warm temperatures in the Northern Hemisphere. With the current disrupted the Northern Hemisphere…show more content…
The wooly mammoth is a large animal which was accustomed to low temperatures. If this animal froze immediately than a human surely would, especially if they were wearing nothing more than a turtleneck. Other scenes in the movie show humans frozen to death, and then others are standing there with nothing wrong. With temperatures as low as they were supposed to be in the movie, the people who were still alive would have a horrible case of frostbite. In the movie, there was no frost bite to be seen. The temperature inconsistencies were glaring in the movie and made it seem incredibly unrealistic.
There were also scenes in the movie where the characters are outrunning the freeze. There is no possible way a person could outrun temperature. There is also no way a person could survive temperatures that low. The temperature was so low that everything was immediately freezing, including flags and buildings. There is no way that a human could possibly survive a temperature that low.
There were some other things that bothered me about the movie, such as the isolation of the ?ice age? The movie?s ice age was specifically isolated to the northern hemisphere. Americans were able to seek refuge from the storm by merely crossing the border into Mexico. So the storm wasn?t even isolated to the Northern Hemisphere, or even North America, it was only in the US and Canada. If there was such a drastic climate change, a simple
Philosophy the Day After Tomorrow advances not only on his previous collections of formal papers, but also on the autobiographical Pitch of Philosophy (1994), by conveying an approach to thought that gives thought itself its due, as an ongoing process of momentary involvement, as distinct from any more mechanized, "automated," positivistic or sparsely logical methods of analysis--and equally we must recall that after all Stanley Cavell's background was precisely given by a various approach to analytic philosophy. The reader is here constantly encouraged in rethinking Wittgenstein's willingness to consult the mysteries of ordinary language itself. In turn, with Stanley Cavell himself, we see the ways this particular philosophy is always unfurling and refolding the flag of its ideas. These essays, sharing some properties of musical variation, deal with the question of individual and social freedom. This crux arises from our being users of language, in our achieving ordinary identity, which is where, in our human condition, the most important philosophical issues may be seen to locate their limits. (Angus Fletcher, author of A New Theory for American Poetry)
Over the course of his long and prodigious career, Stanley Cavell has been concerned with a number of recurrent issues, both philosophical (Wittgenstein, J. L. Austin and ordinary language philosophy; Thoreau, Emerson, and Emersonianism; skepticism) and cultural (America; film; Shakespeare). He has also been, and continues to be, the foremost advocate in this country for a rapprochement between philosophy and literature with a merging of what are known as the Anglo-American and the Continental strains of philosophy. Philosophy the Day After Tomorrow comprises his most recent set of meditations on these issues, and as such it offers at once a welcome revisitation of his work to date and a nuanced, considered extension of his thinking. As is fitting for an intellectual of Cavell's standing, it also provides an opportunity to witness a philosopher at the height of his maturity working through questions to which he has devoted his extraordinary career. (Robert Harrison, author of The Body of Beatrice and The Dominion of the Dead)
One of our most imaginative philosophers, Cavell can always be counted upon to provoke his readers to join him as he soars to dizzying new philosophical heights. With his characteristic aplomb, he ranges over the thoughts of his favorite philosophers, from Nietzsche and Wittgenstein to Heidegger and J. L. Austin, weaving them seamlessly into colorful new patterns with the performative gestures of figures as diverse as Fred Astaire, Shakespeare, Henry James, Jane Austen, George Eliot, and his other favorites, Emerson and Thoreau. Cavell examines themes ranging from the role of the ordinary in philosophy and the intellectual isolation of contemporary American philosophy to the nature and place of skepticism in literature and philosophy...Very few philosopher's demonstrate Cavell's knack for connecting literary and cinematic texts with philosophical writings. (Henry L. Carrigan Jr. Library Journal 2005-02-01)
What has Wittgenstein or Heidegger got to do with Fred Astaire? More than a little, Cavell argues in one of the essays in this new collection, which as a whole demonstrates his nuanced philosophical and intellectual engagement with culture in general, and popular culture in particular. (London Review of Books 2005-08-18)
Stanley Cavell has been a major figure not only as an academic philosopher at Harvard, but also as an educator to those of us who would read modern philosophy if only it were readable. He has a seductively conversational tone, and I am an addict of his essays. A new volume, Philosophy the Day After Tomorrow, does not disappoint. Who but Cavell could begin an essay with Nietsche's Birth of Tragedy and end it with an analysis of Fred Astaire? There are good thoughts on Shakespeare, Henry James, Wittgenstein and, of course, Heidegger. Cavell is one of Heidegger's most intelligible interpreters. (A. N. Wilson Times Literary Supplement 2005-12-02)
Stanley Cavell is widely regarded as one of the most innovative and independent contemporary American philosophers writing today...Cavell's newest book Philosophy the Day after Tomorrow comprises his most recent thinking on topics pertaining to philosophy, literature and film. A collection of ten essays, the book's topics span over the whole range of questions that have at some time or other preoccupied this philosopher's interest...Cavell never disappoints to surprise the reader with his insights. An astute reader and interpreter of works of art, he is showing an acute sensibility that is capable of unearthing new twists and turns in the canonic interpretations of classical and modern works of art (or the supposedly mundane works of the movie world). Only a philosopher such as Cavell could be brave enough to dig out hidden philosophical propositions out of a short sequence of a dancing routine by Fred Astaire. (Harry Witzthum Metapsychology 2005-12-15)